
On November 24, just 48 hours before the National Association of Realtors’ settlement agreement headed to final approval, the Department of Justice filed a statement of interest in the lawsuit.
The filing indicated that the DOJ did not participate in the underlying litigation, but it challenged the settlement’s provision that requires buyers and buyers’ agents to enter into a written agreement before touring a home. This provision raises concerns under antitrust laws that could be addressed in multiple ways, according to the DOJ’s statement.
The DOJ suggested rectifying the issue by eliminating the buyer broker agreement requirement or to disclaim that the settlement creates any immunity or defense under the antitrust laws. Otherwise, the court could clarify that the settlement approval affords no immunity or defense for the buyer-agreement provision. The DOJ believes the settlement could limit the ways buyer brokers compete for clients.
The final hearing is scheduled for November 26 in Missouri. The NAR said in a statement that it will advocate for a final settlement that day. The statement suggested that the settlement is not what the NAR wants, but that it is preferable to continued litigation and the uncertainty of a jury verdict.
We’ll see lots of news on this topic this week and next week!
In the meantime, Happy Thanksgiving wishes for you and your family!
I’ve wondered about this problem ever since the settlement was announced. How could an agreement by brokers requiring buyers to enter into written contracts with buyers’ agents NOT be anticompetitive? None of the commentaries I’ve seen since then even raised this concern.
LikeLike
Really good point, and I haven’t seen any discussions about it either.
LikeLike
The compliance cure to buyer-broker agreements is http://www.ConfirmBuyer.com
LikeLike